September 8, 2017
(l. Matthew Broderick & Ally Sheedy in WarGames, 1983)
Western women have been tricked
into pursuing power instead of love.
Paradoxically, they never have
been so powerless. They
want to be loved but
no longer have love
to offer in exchange.
“Any girl who grows to womanhood without knowing that love is her supreme value has been spiritually raped. Feminine spirituality expresses an attitude of spiritual waiting, and tending, and readiness for the meeting with its opposite which is a prerequisite for inner wholeness. Without this she becomes a prey to the masculine within herself, a raging spirit of intellectual or physical activity to which no man can be related, and to which she can in no way relate herself. She is a woman possessed.” Irene Claremont de Castillejo, Knowing Woman: a Feminine Psychology.
Western Women Have Lost Power to Love (Revised)
by Henry Makow Ph.D.
The movie “WarGames” (1983) illustrates how the Illuminati undermined heterosexuals in 34 short years. In the movie, Matthew Broderick is a computer whiz who accidentally starts a nuclear countdown and races to avert catastrophe. His girlfriend, played by Ally Sheedy is seen in a complementary role, basically helping, encouraging and admiring him. He is the leader. But her presence informs, validates and heightens everything he does. It’s as though his actions are dedicated to her.
This is the way heterosexuality works. Woman empowers man by entrusting her power to husband. This is how woman loves, i.e. by “trusting,” enlisting as First Mate to his Captain. If this movie were remade today, she would be Captain; he would be emasculated, and they would break up.
From Chaucer to Freud, men have asked, “What do women want?” It’s really quite simple. They want to be loved. Specifically, they want the passionate lifelong love of a husband. But what makes a man love a woman in this way? Her sacrifice. By throwing her lot in with his, accepting his leadership, and serving him and their children. In other words, lasting love is earned by deeds. It is not based on sex appeal (which wanes) or witty comebacks. It is built on bonds of GRATITUDE.
By teaching women to be self-seeking instead of self-sacrificing, Feminism has deprived them of their stock-in-trade, love. All they have left to give is sex. Because they won’t surrender to a loving husband, they’re reduced to giving themselves to strangers.
Cabalist Jews and Freemasons are Satanists. They control by degrading and corrupting. Like termites they eat away at the supporting columns of society. The family is the red blood cell of a healthy society. It provides us with our roles and identity, as well as necessary emotional and material support. It ensures the young are born, loved and raised properly, and the aged are taken care of. Our family is our link in the chain of eternity. So the Satanists have always wanted to destroy it.
They went after the women, who they deemed fickle, vain and feeble-minded. “There is no way of influencing men so powerfully as by means of the women, Adam Weishaupt wrote. “These should therefore be our chief study; we should insinuate ourselves into their good opinion, give them hints of emancipation from the tyranny of public opinion, and of standing up for themselves; it will be an immense relief to their enslaved minds to be freed from any one bond of restraint, and it will fire them the more, and cause them to work for us with zeal, without knowing that they do so; for they will only be indulging their own desire of personal admiration.”
They convinced wmen that marriage and family were “oppressive.” Men toiled in factories and died in war to provide and protect, but somehow women were the ones oppressed.
Satanists needed to interfere in the natural affection and attraction males and females have for each other and for their offspring. Satanists exist to banish love.
A woman’s essence is love, the power to generate love, by loving and being loved in return. This is the source of her power. A woman’s love for her husband and children is the most precious thing in the world. For a man, this love is his greatest treasure.
By allowing herself to be snookered, by pursuing material instead of spiritual power, she has essentially lost the power to love. She can have power or love. She can’t have both.
FEMINISTS HAVE BEEN SPIRITUALLY PILLAGED
Women need a man’s love like a flower needs sunshine and water. Men nurture women and women empower men by acquiescing to their reasonable demands. This is the heterosexual dynamic.
Men, if you want to discover if a woman loves you, make a reasonable request and see how she reacts.
Left, Sheila Jeffreys, 68, is best known as a lesbian feminist scholar and political activist.
What Sheila Jeffreys calls “the eroticization of powerlessness” is heterosexuality. But she is a lesbian who obviously can’t understand that women’s love is her power. She wants to turn all women into lesbians who like her can’t understand that woman’s style, beauty, charm (her femininity) depends on eschewing material power.
A woman who gives herself to her husband is cherished and loved by him and their children. A woman who pursues power in masculine terms is doomed to a life of isolation and bitterness.
Western feminist, you’ve forfeited your most precious gift for nothing. You’re vulgar, a real turn-off. You lack personality, charm, style, substance. You can’t love. You’re not even sexy. And soon you won’t have youth. You’ll have nothing but your job, your dog and your equally desperate friends.
Western feminists, you’ve been robbed, betrayed by your society, teachers, and political and cultural leaders; and consequently you’ve joined their traitorous ranks. You’ve betrayed your unborn children, your culture, your family and the promise of the future. But worst of all, you’ve betrayed yourself.
But, if it’s any consolation, you were fleeced by the best.
—-Related– Makow- The Hidden Knowledge of Heterosexuality
Makow—– The End of Woman
First Comment by C – “We are all Communists now…”
As you probably know, the Marxist theorist Walter Benjamin described lesbians as “the heroines of modernism”, by which he meant that modern urban culture had an inevitably masculinizing effect on women – a process he portrayed as progressive.
Reading your excellent piece I was reminded too of the Anglo-Welsh writer Douglas Hyde’s memoir of his membership of the British Communist Party in the 1930s, “I Believed”. Hyde recalled that sexual promiscuity was rampant among his fellow Communists, but the problem for the male communist studs was that they deemed the female members of the party completely “unbedworthy”. Hyde said this was partly because feminine women were mostly not attracted to Communism, and that even when they were, membership of the party – and the promiscuity that went with it – soon masculinized them.
Well in a sense we are all Communists now – the promiscuity of the 1930s commmies was probably tame in comparison with what respectable middle class suburbanites get up to today. And there’s no doubt in my mind that the physical coarsening of modern feminist/SJW female millennials, and their embrace of the crudest forms of machismo – tatoos, piercings, doc marten boots, etc – is directly linked to their parents equally enthusiastic embrace of “sexual liberation” a couple of decades ago.