Arie Goedhart

Latest Russian Sanctions Ignite New Cold War

Russian officials are saying that the latest sanctions thrown on Russia are equivalent to igniting a new Cold War. Russia promises to retaliate for the latest sanctions are being imposed unjustly on their country. It seems to be the sanctions are two benefit the US in the gas market

The Feminist Formula for Killing Love

July 25, 2017


A woman’s love for a man is expressed as trust. By attacking this trust, feminists kill love. 
Masculinity is defined by Power. Femininity is defined by Love. Heterosexual marriage involves the exchange of female worldly power for male power expressed as love.
I have written on this subject  for 15 years but periodically the truth resounds again with greater clarity.
If our culture wasn’t controlled by Communists (Satanist bankers), my book Cruel Hoax: Feminism and the NWOwould be a bestseller. We are being deliberately subverted.
Women love a man by surrendering their worldly power and putting their trust in him. Female love is epitomized by trust. If she doesn’t trust him, she doesn’t love him. This is the way two people become one in marriage. A husband “possesses” his wife and this is symbolized and consecrated by the sex act.
Communist bankers wish to reengineer society by destroying love, marriage and family. They use feminism to teach women to seek power
instead of love. A constant drumbeat of propaganda (infidelity, domestic violence, sexual harassment etc.) is designed to disparage men and teach women NOT to trust them. There is a drumbeat of propaganda teaching women to be promiscuous and not seek permanent love. By killing trust, they have killed love. This is the feminist formula for purging the world of love.
Communism is Satanism, and until we realize we are under occult attack daily, we will be helpless to defend ourselves.
The difference between an alpha and beta man is that an Alpha Male convinces a woman to do what he wants. He makes her want to be his.
A Beta Male hopes she’ll love him if he does what she wants. A Beta Male can never satisfy a woman.
But a woman must choose to belong (surrender) to her husband. And, of course, a husband must first earn her trust (through courtship) and keep it.
Feminism cries out for “equality.”  Equality does not mean the same. Men and woman are different and have different needs. Men need power; women need love. Heterosexual love is the exchange of the two.
Below are excerpts from a 2013 essay by another man who describes the damage done in the real world by feminism.

“Woman is a violent and uncontrolled animal… If you allow them to achieve complete equality with men, do you think they will be easier to live with? Not at all. Once they have achieved equality, they will be your masters.”
– Cato the Elder
The New Age and Spiritual movements are fond of saying that history has been controlled by patriarchal societies which have suppressed the “feminine energy”, hence causing imbalance and destruction. For example, the popular Internet films “Esoteric Agenda” and “Kymatica” make this point.
However, what these movements are afraid to admit, is that modern day feminism totally suppresses and destroys this “feminine energy” more than any patriarchal society ever did. And that’s the irony, that feminism destroys femininity. So then, why use such a term when it’s effects are the exact opposite? Why isn’t this movement called “masculinity for women”?
Obviously, whoever was behind this movement knew something about neurolinguistic programming – that by pretending to be the opposite of what you are, you trick and lure people by using deception. In this case, women who consider themselves “feminine” will uncritically assume that a movement called “feminism” must be on their side in helping with their womanhood and femininity, when nothing could be further from the truth.
The sad thing is that many women are tricked into thinking that this “new feminism” is somehow liberating them and allowing them to reach their full potential. Yet how can they become self-actualized by suppressing their own natural life force or feminine energy?
How is that wholesome or harmonious, when it’s destructive to relationships and forces men to emasculate themselves and deny their own masculinity?


Any time you try to bring up something by oppressing others, it will be a formula for destruction. These women are tricked and lured in by the promise of “equality”, which eventually turns them asexual, bestial and dominant before they know it. That’s the “trap of feminism”.
The natural female energy is loving, caring, nurturing, tender, and seeks a symbiotic relationship with the male energy. This results in the creation of life, the highest power. Whatever you want to call it – God, Mother Nature, the Universal Creative Force, etc. – that is how it was naturally meant to be. Male and female energy were meant to complement each other, not compete and tear each other down, or engage in any “battle of the sexes”, which is what has happened (and may possibly be engineered by the global elite according to some sources, Google “Nick Rockefeller and feminism”).
Yet the feminist movement and its values preach the complete opposite and antithesis. Not only do they incite male bashing and double standards against men in society  but they indoctrinate women to look down on men, NOT NEED men, NOT WANT men, be independent, and view males as lower forms of life that are creeps and oppressors by nature. Men are not respected or admired, but seen as immature and dumb.
Feminism … makes dating a nightmare of epic proportions, and totally disrupts the natural harmony of men and women. It turns women hateful and apathetic toward men. In effect, it gives women an unaccountable status where they can get away with anything, and demonetize anyone who resists. As a result, they can abuse and mistreat men without judgment or consequences, for it is taboo to argue or stand up to them.
Females in America are given role models in the form of action stars, like Angelina Jolie, who in Tomb Raider as Lara Croft, is rough and tough, kicks ***, does not need men, does not act sweet, feminine or tender, does not giggle or blush, and all the while looking sexy at the same time.


Yet any honest natural man will tell you that such a woman with no feminine qualities is not attractive at all, and dealing with her is very awkward. How can you have a loving, intimate, fulfilling relationship with a woman who is rough and tough, doesn’t need you and tries to act stronger than you? You can’t flirt with her, court her, or charm her without feeling like you are violating her “independence from femininity”. Yet you can’t treat her like a male buddy either, because no matter how hard she tries to act like a man, she is not one, in ANY way. So what can you do with her?! You can’t treat her like a man or a woman! It’s the most awkward and unnatural thing.
Plus, a feminist can never become a man, because a normal man is not high strung or easily offended by little things the way a feminist or masculine woman is. Thus these feminists are more like bestial freaks of nature, rather than men, which is a horrible thing.
Furthermore, these feminists and independent women do not like to dress feminine. They hate wearing skits and high heels (which they view as oppressive) and like cutting their hair short to look like men. How can that be beautiful or feminine to men? How can that bring out the male attraction for the feminine? How can being strong, masculine and independent soothe a man’s need for tenderness and fulfill his need for love and romance and his need to merge with the female energy?!
What strong independent American women don’t understand, is that you can’t make a man become more masculine by becoming masculine yourself. You bring out the masculinity in a man by becoming FEMININE! That’s the key truth that feminism hides from you. Obviously feminism has F***ED up relationships in America, whether it was engineered or not. There’s no way around it. And that’s NOT a good thing.
It’s a total scam against women. It masculines women and emasculates men, twisting the male/female dynamic out of whack, turning America into the most unnatural dating scene in the world. It is also tyranny in disguise, which seeks to placate and weaken males, while giving women unaccountable power, which corrupts and ruins relationships.
Feminists NEVER win on logic or reason, because their movement is not a rational one at all, but a hateful emotional one that uses shaming tactics rather than reason. Overall, it is destructive and deceptive to both men and women. Worst of all, it destroys and suppresses the most beautiful thing in the world – the feminine beauty and soul.
So if you are really pro-women and pro-female, you’d expose this scam and bring awareness of it, so people can see what it really is. You’d help women get back in touch with their true divine female energy inherent in them, and stop this scam which tries to get women to deny their own femininity.

US Plan to Re-Occupy Iraq Faces Iraqi Resistance

Iraqi VP gave the US a piece of his mind

Tue, Jul 25, 2017 | 3144 24

The US’s longstanding project to push for an independent Kurdistan in the oil-rich regions of northern Iraq and Syria in the downstream of the defeat of the ISIS have run into strong headwinds. This could have been anticipated because the plans essentially devolve upon the balkanization of Syria and Iraq, which will be seriously resisted by the non-Kurdish Arab people.

The Iraqi Vice-President Nouri Maliki did some plain speaking on Friday when he warned the US against any attempt to claw its way back into Iraq as an occupation force on the pretext of fighting the ISIS threat. Maliki said: “We do not want a military base in al-Waleed, the Iraqi society is against foreign bases on the country’s territory … I told the US side it was not in its interests to return to Iraq to establish military bases again.”

Maliki was instrumental as the then Iraqi Prime Minister in slamming the door shut on continued US military presence beyond 2009. The Obama administration eventually settled scores by ousting Maliki and having him replaced by a more amiable leadership in Baghdad. But then, Maliki cannot be put down for long and the irrepressible Shi’ite politician is back on the centre stage of Iraqi nationalism. The wheel has come full circle.

Now, Maliki didn’t speak out of turn. Three developments in the past ten days suggest that practical steps are being taken by other interested parties also to subvert the US calculus. Thus, Turkey simply decided to ‘declassify’ the exact location of the American military bases in northern Iraq in the Kurdish region. It was supposed to be ‘Top Secret’ information but Turkish news agency Anadolu nonetheless published the details of their exact location, nature and size ten days ago.

It transpires that the Pentagon has surreptitiously established not less than eleven US military bases in northern Syria so far.Unsurprisingly, Pentagon is peeved that the Turkish ‘leak’ puts the lives of US service personnel in jeopardy! Now, isn’t that funny? After all, war is dangerous business; besides, when you go and set up a string of military bases in a faraway country without bothering to even intimate the local government, you are asking for serious trouble.

True, the terrorist groups rampant in Syria and Iraq now know precisely where to hit if they want to get at American interests. Although the western media have been advised not to carry the Anadolu report, it is bazaar gossip now all over the Muslim Middle East. ((The map detailing the 11 US bases is here.)

Evidently, it is payback time for Turkey on the first anniversary of the attempted coup of July 15, 2016, which Ankara believes had CIA backing. Also, Turkey is livid that the US is consolidating its military presence in northern Syria and is beefing up the Kurdish militia by way of providing the strategic underpinning for an independent Kurdistan.

Indeed, Turkey is a stakeholder (along with Iran and Russia) in preserving the territorial integrity of Syria and Iraq. Thus, in another development last Thursday, Moscow confirmed that it has struck a major arms deal with Baghdad to deliver “a large batch” of advanced Russian-made T-90 tanks to the Iraqi military. Vladimir Kozhin, an aide to the Russian president on military-technical cooperation, disclosed this to Izvestiya newspaper and it has also been confirmed by the Iraqi defence ministry. T-90 is among the best-selling tanks in the world.

So, what is Moscow’s game plan? At the most obvious level, Moscow is reclaiming its traditional partnership with Baghdad (till the US invasion of Iraq in 2003) in the military field. Without doubt, Russia intends to contest any attempt by the US to exercise monopoly in this field. Second, in political terms, Russia estimates that a strong Iraqi army is the best guarantee against any moves to challenge the country’s unity. Indeed, Iraqis have seen that T-90 tanks have done splendidly well in the operations against ISIS in Syria, especially in Aleppo.

Meanwhile, on Sunday, an Iran-Iraq defence agreement has been unveiled in Tehran. The Iranian news agency IRNA reported yesterday that the agreement provides for the “expansion of cooperation and sharing experiences in the fields of fight against terrorism and extremism, border security, training, logistics, technical and military supports.”   

Of course, like Turkey and Russia, Iran also would have high stakes in ensuring Iraq’s territorial integrity. Kurdish separatism is a challenge that Iraq, Syria, Turkey and Iran have faced in the past. The shared concerns in this regard could be the basis of a regional convergence in opposing the US plans to encourage Kurdish independence.

The Iraqi Shi’ite militia, trained and equipped by Iran and supported by Iranian advisors drawn from the elite Quds Force, have played a crucial role in the liberation of Mosul and in the overall struggle against the ISIS. Known as the Iraqi Popular Mobilization Forces, they form the backbone of the Iraqi war machine.

From the Iranian perspective, it is of utmost importance to strengthen the ‘axis of resistance’, given the Trump administration’s hostile policies toward Tehran. Iran will see any prospect of  US presence in Iraq as an existential threat. Put simply, keeping Iraq, a major OPEC country, out of the US orbit becomes an absolute strategic necessity for Tehran.