Eindtijd ontwikkelingen

Latest Post – Unsealed

Aangeleverd door: It’s Me

Researchers Discover 2,000 Year Old Baby

Posted: 25 Jul 2017 09:58 AM PDT

Amid much opposition, biblical researchers from ERF Ministries, WatchForTheDay, Parable of the Vineyard, Revelation 12 Daily, and Unsealed have found what appears to be a perfectly healthy 2,000 year old baby – a male child in fact.  Only this baby is still in his mother’s womb – at least at the moment.

“We believe he was conceived in AD 32 or 33, probably around the Jewish festival of Shavuot,” said head ERF researcher Scott Clarke.  “There were apparently 120 eyewitnesses present at his conception and 3,000 more were able to corroborate their testimony.”

The discovery of the baby began about a decade ago when Daniel from WatchForTheDay determined that the Great Pyramid of Giza was pointing to a certain astronomical alignment in 2017:  “I knew something big was going to happen this year because of the [pyramid’s] alignment and it reminded me of the birth of another baby boy that took place in 3 or 2 BC.  I had to follow the evidence.”

Then in 2010, Clarke used a number of important clues from a 2,000 year old book called Revelation to identify a matching astronomical alignment set to take place in September 2017.  “It’s a perfect match.  This hasn’t happened before and it won’t happen again.  The alignment portrays a woman who is about to give birth to a baby boy.  No doubt about it.”  Clarke encourages others to see this alignment for themselves.  “This isn’t based on calculations or subjective reasoning.  You can see it for yourself with any astronomy software, but I prefer Stellarium.”

A few years after Clarke’s groundbreaking discovery, Dr. Svigel from Dallas Theological Seminary uncovered some 19th century scholarship that identified this yet-to-be-born baby boy with the Church and Gary from Unsealed made the connection to the astronomical alignment that Clarke had discovered.  “I think the alignment in 2017 is pointing to the birth of this baby,” said Gary.

Jeff from Unsealed was quick to chime in.  “This baby has been gestating for 2,000 years.  Clearly a world record and what’s more – according to the ancient book of Isaiah, the baby is going to be born before his mother goes into labor.  It’s astonishing!  Why aren’t more people talking about this?”

“We’re about to submit the paperwork to the Guinness World Records.  I don’t think anything comes close,” said Adam from Parable of the Vineyard.  “What’s amazing to me is that many have come before us, but they had no peer review.  There was that guy Miller in the 1800s and then Camping in 2011, but this is a team effort.  Each of us have independently confirmed the findings.  It’s not just one witness, but dozens.”

Brad from Revelation 12 Daily has been tirelessly compiling all of the various information and keeping the team going with prayer and encouragement despite the vocal opposition.  “All of the naysayers have one thing in common: they aren’t trusting what the biblical text plainly says.  Are they afraid of the implications or is it just pride?  It’s as clear as day, yet they choose to ignore this mountain of evidence.”

Another thing the team agrees on is that the astronomical alignment pointing to the baby’s birth is just the icing on the cake.  They point to a lot of other compelling evidence that a 2,000 year old baby is about to be born.  “2017 is 120 years since the First Zionist Congress, 100 years since the Balfour Declaration, 70 years since the UN mandate to establish a Jewish state, 50 years since Jerusalem was captured, 40 years since the peace process began, and 30 years since The Temple Institute was founded.  There’s never been a year quite like this,” said Greg from Unsealed who quickly added, “There is a lot going on and it might be a good idea for people to pay attention.”

They also agreed that they can’t set an exact due date for the baby, but all indications are that he will be born very soon – probably this year.

Sputnik: ‘Persian Gulf is No Place for US Navy’

This handout image provided Tuesday, July 25, 2017, from the U.S. Navy purports to show an Iranian vessel making a close approach to a U.S. coastal patrol ship USS Thunderbolt, right. The U.S. Navy patrol boat fired warning shots near the Iranian vessel that American sailors said came dangerously close to them during a tense encounter in the Persian Gulf.

A US Navy patrol boat fired warning shots on Tuesday near an Iranian vessel in the Persian Gulf. Tehran slammed the incident as “a provocation.” In an interview with Sputnik, military expert Dmitry Litovkin said that the mere presence of US warships in the Gulf is fraught with unpredictable consequences.

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) blamed the American vessel, the USS Thunderbolt, for provoking the tense encounter.

It said that the US ship had come dangerously close to the Iranian naval ship on a patrol mission in international waters the north of the Gulf, and fired two warning shots “with the intention of provoking and intimidating” the Iranian sailors.According to Iran’s Press TV, the Iranian ship ignored the Americans’ “provocative and unprofessional act” and proceeded with its mission. The IRGC later said that the US ship had left the area.

In an interview with Radio Sputnik, military expert, Captain 3rd Rank, Dmitry Litovkin said that there is no place for the US Navy in the Persian Gulf.

“The Persian Gulf is very far away from US territorial waters. Still, it was the American ship that opened fire. Iran is washed by the Persian Gulf and has a security zone there, which it controls. What the US Navy is doing there is a very big question,” Litovkin said.

He added that the Americans have several big naval bases in the region, which apparently control oil traffic in the Gulf.

“From the standpoint of the International Law of the Seas, the Americans’ actions in the Gulf are absolutely illegal. What are they doing there? They are conducting a military operation in Iraq and trying to impose democracy on Syria. All the other countries in the region which are against this are thus seen as being in the way,” Litovkin noted.

He said that the US was doing much the same in other parts of the globe.

“I remember how a Russian fighter jet ”buzzed” a US destroyer in the Black Sea, turning on its electronic jammer and forcing the  shocked Americans to beat a hasty retreat. However, it was the US ship approaching our shores, not our plane flying towards the US coast. It’s a case of who is at home and who is not,” Dmitry Litovkin emphasized.

In a similar incident in August, Pentagon officials said Iranian speedboats had “harassed” US warships in the Strait of Hormuz. They claimed that Iranian boats moved close to two US Navy destroyers with their weapons uncovered in the strait in an “unsafe and unprofessional” encounter.Based on the United Nations Convention on Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), Iran has the right to “decisively confront” any menacing passage through the Strait of Hormuz, according to IRGC second-in-command,  Brigadier General Hossein Salami then told Press TV.

Latest Russian Sanctions Ignite New Cold War

Russian officials are saying that the latest sanctions thrown on Russia are equivalent to igniting a new Cold War. Russia promises to retaliate for the latest sanctions are being imposed unjustly on their country. It seems to be the sanctions are two benefit the US in the gas market

Diverse Nieuwsfeiten, verzameld door: Nico Talma


















The Feminist Formula for Killing Love

July 25, 2017


A woman’s love for a man is expressed as trust. By attacking this trust, feminists kill love. 
Masculinity is defined by Power. Femininity is defined by Love. Heterosexual marriage involves the exchange of female worldly power for male power expressed as love.
I have written on this subject  for 15 years but periodically the truth resounds again with greater clarity.
If our culture wasn’t controlled by Communists (Satanist bankers), my book Cruel Hoax: Feminism and the NWOwould be a bestseller. We are being deliberately subverted.
Women love a man by surrendering their worldly power and putting their trust in him. Female love is epitomized by trust. If she doesn’t trust him, she doesn’t love him. This is the way two people become one in marriage. A husband “possesses” his wife and this is symbolized and consecrated by the sex act.
Communist bankers wish to reengineer society by destroying love, marriage and family. They use feminism to teach women to seek power
instead of love. A constant drumbeat of propaganda (infidelity, domestic violence, sexual harassment etc.) is designed to disparage men and teach women NOT to trust them. There is a drumbeat of propaganda teaching women to be promiscuous and not seek permanent love. By killing trust, they have killed love. This is the feminist formula for purging the world of love.
Communism is Satanism, and until we realize we are under occult attack daily, we will be helpless to defend ourselves.
The difference between an alpha and beta man is that an Alpha Male convinces a woman to do what he wants. He makes her want to be his.
A Beta Male hopes she’ll love him if he does what she wants. A Beta Male can never satisfy a woman.
But a woman must choose to belong (surrender) to her husband. And, of course, a husband must first earn her trust (through courtship) and keep it.
Feminism cries out for “equality.”  Equality does not mean the same. Men and woman are different and have different needs. Men need power; women need love. Heterosexual love is the exchange of the two.
Below are excerpts from a 2013 essay by another man who describes the damage done in the real world by feminism.

“Woman is a violent and uncontrolled animal… If you allow them to achieve complete equality with men, do you think they will be easier to live with? Not at all. Once they have achieved equality, they will be your masters.”
– Cato the Elder
The New Age and Spiritual movements are fond of saying that history has been controlled by patriarchal societies which have suppressed the “feminine energy”, hence causing imbalance and destruction. For example, the popular Internet films “Esoteric Agenda” and “Kymatica” make this point.
However, what these movements are afraid to admit, is that modern day feminism totally suppresses and destroys this “feminine energy” more than any patriarchal society ever did. And that’s the irony, that feminism destroys femininity. So then, why use such a term when it’s effects are the exact opposite? Why isn’t this movement called “masculinity for women”?
Obviously, whoever was behind this movement knew something about neurolinguistic programming – that by pretending to be the opposite of what you are, you trick and lure people by using deception. In this case, women who consider themselves “feminine” will uncritically assume that a movement called “feminism” must be on their side in helping with their womanhood and femininity, when nothing could be further from the truth.
The sad thing is that many women are tricked into thinking that this “new feminism” is somehow liberating them and allowing them to reach their full potential. Yet how can they become self-actualized by suppressing their own natural life force or feminine energy?
How is that wholesome or harmonious, when it’s destructive to relationships and forces men to emasculate themselves and deny their own masculinity?


Any time you try to bring up something by oppressing others, it will be a formula for destruction. These women are tricked and lured in by the promise of “equality”, which eventually turns them asexual, bestial and dominant before they know it. That’s the “trap of feminism”.
The natural female energy is loving, caring, nurturing, tender, and seeks a symbiotic relationship with the male energy. This results in the creation of life, the highest power. Whatever you want to call it – God, Mother Nature, the Universal Creative Force, etc. – that is how it was naturally meant to be. Male and female energy were meant to complement each other, not compete and tear each other down, or engage in any “battle of the sexes”, which is what has happened (and may possibly be engineered by the global elite according to some sources, Google “Nick Rockefeller and feminism”).
Yet the feminist movement and its values preach the complete opposite and antithesis. Not only do they incite male bashing and double standards against men in society  but they indoctrinate women to look down on men, NOT NEED men, NOT WANT men, be independent, and view males as lower forms of life that are creeps and oppressors by nature. Men are not respected or admired, but seen as immature and dumb.
Feminism … makes dating a nightmare of epic proportions, and totally disrupts the natural harmony of men and women. It turns women hateful and apathetic toward men. In effect, it gives women an unaccountable status where they can get away with anything, and demonetize anyone who resists. As a result, they can abuse and mistreat men without judgment or consequences, for it is taboo to argue or stand up to them.
Females in America are given role models in the form of action stars, like Angelina Jolie, who in Tomb Raider as Lara Croft, is rough and tough, kicks ***, does not need men, does not act sweet, feminine or tender, does not giggle or blush, and all the while looking sexy at the same time.


Yet any honest natural man will tell you that such a woman with no feminine qualities is not attractive at all, and dealing with her is very awkward. How can you have a loving, intimate, fulfilling relationship with a woman who is rough and tough, doesn’t need you and tries to act stronger than you? You can’t flirt with her, court her, or charm her without feeling like you are violating her “independence from femininity”. Yet you can’t treat her like a male buddy either, because no matter how hard she tries to act like a man, she is not one, in ANY way. So what can you do with her?! You can’t treat her like a man or a woman! It’s the most awkward and unnatural thing.
Plus, a feminist can never become a man, because a normal man is not high strung or easily offended by little things the way a feminist or masculine woman is. Thus these feminists are more like bestial freaks of nature, rather than men, which is a horrible thing.
Furthermore, these feminists and independent women do not like to dress feminine. They hate wearing skits and high heels (which they view as oppressive) and like cutting their hair short to look like men. How can that be beautiful or feminine to men? How can that bring out the male attraction for the feminine? How can being strong, masculine and independent soothe a man’s need for tenderness and fulfill his need for love and romance and his need to merge with the female energy?!
What strong independent American women don’t understand, is that you can’t make a man become more masculine by becoming masculine yourself. You bring out the masculinity in a man by becoming FEMININE! That’s the key truth that feminism hides from you. Obviously feminism has F***ED up relationships in America, whether it was engineered or not. There’s no way around it. And that’s NOT a good thing.
It’s a total scam against women. It masculines women and emasculates men, twisting the male/female dynamic out of whack, turning America into the most unnatural dating scene in the world. It is also tyranny in disguise, which seeks to placate and weaken males, while giving women unaccountable power, which corrupts and ruins relationships.
Feminists NEVER win on logic or reason, because their movement is not a rational one at all, but a hateful emotional one that uses shaming tactics rather than reason. Overall, it is destructive and deceptive to both men and women. Worst of all, it destroys and suppresses the most beautiful thing in the world – the feminine beauty and soul.
So if you are really pro-women and pro-female, you’d expose this scam and bring awareness of it, so people can see what it really is. You’d help women get back in touch with their true divine female energy inherent in them, and stop this scam which tries to get women to deny their own femininity.