Religie


Canada Passes Motion M103 Leading Shocked Citizenry To Believe Sharia Law Courts Are Coming

 

New post on Now The End Begins

 

Klik:>Canada Passes Motion M103 Leading Shocked Citizenry To Believe Sharia Law Courts Are Coming

by Geoffrey Grider

The Canadian House of Commons has passed motion M103 which singles out the criticism of Islam as a form of “Islamophobia”. Critics condemn it as an attack on free speech.

EDITOR’S NOTE: Canada just made it a crime to say anything critical of Islam with the passage of Motion M103, effectively chipping away another huge chunk of what remains of free speech in that nation. Conservatives are rightly afraid that they may soon see the establishment of Sharia Courts in Canada. 

Motion M103 was tabled by Iqra Khalid, a Muslim member of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s Liberal Party. It states the government must “condemn Islamophobia and all forms of systemic racism and religious discrimination”, was taken to vote on Thursday evening where a total of 201 MPs voted for it and only 91 voted against, Canadian broadcaster Global News reports.

The text of the motion does not clarify what constitutes “Islamophobia” and has led many to speculate what that may mean in the future, with some critics fearing it could lead to Shariah law courts. This concern has led to the circulation of an anti-Shariah petition on the Parliament of Canada website, which has so far been signed by over 24,000 people.

 

Ms. Khalid, who was born in Pakistan and moved to the UK and then to Canada, said the definition of Islamophobia was: “The irrational hate of Muslims that leads to discrimination.”

When Conservatives asked her to remove Islamophobia from the motion, she said: “I will not do so, any more than I would speak to the Holocaust and not mention that the overwhelming majority of victims were six million followers of the Jewish faith and that anti-Semitism was the root cause of the Holocaust.”

Another part of the bill that has stirred controversy is the passage that asks the government to “recognise the need to quell the increasing public climate of hate and fear”. It is currently unknown what measures the government will take to “quell” “hate and fear” as the motion is not classified as a law and has no effect on current criminal law.

Sharia Law – The Truth About Islam (Quran Exposed)

The Conservative Party of Canada are currently holding leadership elections and many of the candidates have come out against M103 including one of the frontrunners, Quebecer Maxime Bernier. Mr. Bernier, a conservative with libertarian free market leanings, said he voted against the bill tweeting: “Free speech is the most fundamental right we have. I am opposed to #m103. Canadians should be treated equally regardless of religion.”

Mar 23, 2017 Canada’s House of Commons has just passed the Liberal blasphemy motion M103, is this where Canada is going next..stay tuned pic.twitter.com/47PKnrbwXv

— art lowe 2012, 2016 (@freedomsforever) March 24, 2017

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, who during the election campaign championed Muslim women wearing hijabs and full face niqabs, dropped an appeal by the previous government that would not allow women to wear niqabs to Canadian citizenship ceremonies.

Trudeau has also appeared at many mosques, including one where the women weren’t allowed in the main prayer room with the men but were forced to pray in a separate area upstairs.

The self-proclaimed “feminist” Prime Minister said: “Diversity is a source of strength, not just a source of weakness, and as I look at this beautiful room — sisters upstairs — everyone here, (I see) the diversity we have just within this mosque, within the Islamic community, within the Muslim community in Canada.” source

 

 

Geoffrey Grider | March 26, 2017 at 9:34 am | Tags: motion M103 | Categories: Islam In Canada, The Big Story | URL: http://wp.me/p1kFP6-cDT

Comment    See all comments

 


‘Rutte in Rome; beter dat de EU wat afstand neemt van het Vaticaan’

Aangeleverd door: Sam Jansen

     

OPINIE

‘Rutte in Rome; beter dat de EU wat afstand neemt van het Vaticaan’

EU zou schijn van religieuze partijdigheid moeten vermijden

Vijfhonderd jaar geleden, rond deze tijd van het jaar begon Maarten Luther met het schrijven van zijn 95 stellingen die het begin vormden van de reformatie. Inmiddels lijken weer steeds meer wegen naar Rome te leiden. Op zaterdag 25 maart zweren de leiders van de 27 EU lidstaten in Rome trouw aan Brussel, onder toeziend oog of in elk geval in nabijheid van Paus Franciscus. De  lidstaten kennen weliswaar het White paper van Jean Claude Juncker , waarin hij 5 scenario’s  schetst voor de toekomst van de EU, maar  ze kennen nog steeds niet de exacte inhoud van de gemaakte keuze en de af te leggen gelofte van trouw. En de verschillende parlementen hebben daarover nog niet eens kunnen spreken.

Lees verder op: > http://politiek.tpo.nl/2017/03/24/rutte-rome-beter-eu-afstand-neemt-vaticaan/


Hirsi Ali: ‘Dom dat links islamitisch aspect terreur niet erkent’

Hirsi Ali: ‘Dom dat links islamitisch aspect terreur niet erkent’

DELEN

Facebook
Twitter

Links sluit de ogen voor de invloed van de islam op terrorisme, stelt Ayaan Hirsi Ali naar aanleiding van de aanslagen in Londen. Het oud-VVD-Kamerlid noemt het masochistisch en dom om weg te kijken van het echte probleem.

In een interview met de Amerikaanse zender Fox News haalt Hirsi Ali hard uit naar politici die het religieuze aspect van islamitische terreur niet erkennen. In de nasleep van de aanslagen bij het Britse parlement in Londen is de discussie over terrorisme weer losgebarsten.

Rol van de islam

Bij die aanslag vielen vier doden, waaronder de aanslagpleger. De politie in Groot-Brittannië gaat uit van een aanslag geïnspireerd door IS, onder meer doordat er een auto is gebruikt om de moorden te plegen.

Mark Rowley, hoofd van de antiterreureenheid van de Britse politie, zegt vooral bang te zijn voor reacties op de aanslag en voor het effect op moslims in Groot-Brittannië. ‘We moeten nu inzien dat onze moslimgemeenschappen angst voelen in deze tijden,’ aldus Rowley, die belooft te blijven samenwerken met de islamitische gemeenschappen.

Volgens Hirsi Ali moet links meer doen dan alleen sympathie tonen voor moslimgemeenschappen. ‘Extreme moslims hebben liberals nog nooit bedankt voor hun tolerantie. Ze hebben nooit gezegd: bedankt voor jullie bescherming, nu zullen we geen aanslagen meer plegen.’

Tolerantie vs sharia?

Extreme moslims moeten niets hebben van die tolerantie, stelt de voormalige politicus. ‘Islamisten willen geen sympathie, ze willen een maatschappij – en uiteindelijk een wereld – waarin naar de sharia wordt geleefd. Dat klinkt raar voor ons, maar dat is het echte doel.’

Die sharia-wereld moet worden bereikt door middel van indoctrinatie, intimidatie en geweld. ‘Iedereen die de sharia wil blokkeren is hun vijand, ongeacht hoe aardig je bent, hoe meegaand en vriendelijk je bent. Dat is gewoon het doel.’

Maatregelen om terreur aan te pakken, moeten juist worden omarmd, stelde Hirsi Ali al eerder. Zij verdedigde in februari het inreisverbod voor mensen uit zeven moslimlanden van de Amerikaanse president Donald Trump. Ze noemde deze ‘moslimban’ ietwat onhandig, maar het onderliggende doel was volgens de voormalige vluchteling uit Somalië correct.


George Soros Has Infiltrated The Southern Baptist Convention And Suing To Build A Mosque In NJ

Aangeleverd door: It’s Me

New post on Now The End Begins

 

Klik:>George Soros Has Infiltrated The Southern Baptist Convention And Suing To Build A Mosque In NJ

by Geoffrey Grider

Pastor Dean Haun called the amicus brief an “unholy alliance” with a false religion, and accused the SBC agencies of overstepping their bounds, reported Baptist Press.

“But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction.” 2 Peter 2:1 (KJV)

EDITOR’S NOTE: Some of you may know that for over a year now, the SBC (Southern Baptist Convention) has been backing a lawsuit demanding that a mosque in NJ be allowed to be built. But what you may not know is that George Soros has donated over $25 million dollars to this effort through Russell Moore, who serves on Soros’ Evangelical Immigration Table? Who is Russell Moore? He is the president of the SBC’s Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission, and a mole for George Soros

The trouble started last May, when several arms of the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) reached out a legal hand to a Muslim community in New Jersey, publicly supporting their right to build a mosque.

The International Mission Board (IMB) and Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission (ERLC) were 2 of 18 religious groups that filed an amicus brief decrying the Township of Bernards’ zoning board decision that required the proposed mosque to have more parking spaces than Christian or Jewish places of worship.

Meet George Soros’ Mole Inside The Southern Baptist Convention:

The town’s reasoning: since Muslim services are held on Fridays, people would be coming after work instead of together as families, and therefore more spots would be needed. But when the Muslim community offered to split the services, or use ride-sharing or overflow arrangements, the board still denied their application.

Southern Baptist Convention Supports Mosques:

The amicus brief, which was also signed by the National Association of Evangelicals and the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, argued that “such unequal treatment of the mosque in this case represents a potential threat to the free exercise rights of each of the amici represented here and is a affront to our nation’s commitment to religious liberty for all.”

On New Year’s Eve, a judge agreed.

Less than a month later, IMB trustee and Tennessee megachurch pastor Dean Haun resigned with a year left on his term.

“I love our IMB leadership and our missionaries and their work across the globe. I am not a rabble rouser and my heart is not to take down the IMB,” Haun told the Baptist and Reflector, the newspaper of the Tennessee Baptist Convention and one of the SBC’s oldest state papers.

“[But] if we defend the rights of people to construct places of false worship, are we not helping them speed down the highway to hell?” he said. “I want no part in supporting a false religion, even if it is in the name of religious freedom.”

He called the amicus brief an “unholy alliance” with a false religion, and accused the SBC agencies of overstepping their bounds, reported Baptist Press. source

Geoffrey Grider | March 23, 2017 at 1:55 pm | URL: http://wp.me/p1kFP6-cDr

Comment    See all comments