De ‘HIV overdracht mythe’ door nieuw wetenschappelijk onderzoek totaal onderuit gehaald

HIV transmission MYTH totally blown away by new science: Unprotected sex with HIV-infected partners produces almost ZERO new infections

Image: HIV transmission MYTH totally blown away by new science: Unprotected sex with HIV-infected partners produces almost ZERO new infections

(Natural News) No new cases of HIV emerged among a group of gay men who had unprotected sex with infected partners who were undergoing treatment in a new Australian study. While this might be shocking to those of us who have been subjected to the CDC’s fear campaigns surrounding the virus, most scientists and doctors who have been working in AIDS-related fields have long known that the risks of transmission are often wildly exaggerated.

University of New South Wales researchers assessed the sexual activity and rates of HIV transmission among more than 350 gay couples in which one partner was infected with the virus. Each of the couples, who lived in Australia, Thailand and Brazil, reported their sexual activity over the course of four years. During that time, the HIV-negative partners were tested regularly to detect any new infections.

During the study’s four-year duration, not a single participant contracted HIV from his HIV-positive partner, even though the participants had anal sex nearly 17,000 times in total without using condoms. Although three new cases did arise, analysis of the virus in those men found that it was caused not by the infected partner but from sex outside of the relationship. The findings of what is said to be the biggest study of its kind were presented during the Paris AIDS Conference on HIV Science.

This research highlights the importance of preventing the transmission of the virus, particularly when it comes to gay men. According to the study’s lead author, Professor Andrew Grulich, the risk of transmission via anal sex is 10 times higher than the risk through vaginal intercourse.

Prevention is the focus of the “Undetectable equals Untransmissible” campaign that is currently underway and is aimed at urging those who have the virus to continue their treatment so they do not infect others with it.

Statistics paint a far different story than that depicted by CDC fear-mongering

Contrast this with the approach used in the 1980s and 1990s, when HIV fears hit a fever pitch. Despite the overwhelming evidence that gay men have a much higher risk of contracting the disease than heterosexual couples, false fears were spread to secure more funding. Posters depicting graveyards and cemeteries did their best to scare everyone into thinking they were at risk, all while taking much-needed funding away from the at-risk groups that needed help the most.

In 1987, the use of federal funds for AIDS prevention campaigns that encouraged or promoted homosexual activities was banned. Many people feel that some used the opportunity to push their morals on others given the nature of transmission.

The CDC might have been technically correct in their message that “anyone can get it”, but it was wrong to play down its much higher prevalence in certain populations. This fear-mongering was very convenient for them in terms of getting funding, but it wasn’t based on many facts.

In a 1996 article that the Wall Street Journal boldly published on its front page entitled “AIDS Fight Is Skewed By Federal Campaign Exaggerating Risks”, writers Anita Sharpe and Amanda Bennet took federal health officials to task for misleading the public about the odds, which they said are 1,000 to one against female HIV infection from a single incident of vaginal intercourse with an HIV-positive male partner. They added the risk was smaller than getting hit by lightning.

They drew attention to the CDC’s “marketing campaign” to help funding flow to various AIDS programs, which exaggerated the risk of heterosexual transmission because campaign planners felt that funding was unlikely if the disease was viewed mainly as a problem confined to gay men and drug abusers.

Most of the cases of HIV spread among women and heterosexual men stem from intravenous drug use rather than sexual intercourse, and we now also know that transmission from those with undetectable viral loads who stick to their treatment regimen is practically zero, even among homosexuals.

No AIDS epidemic among heterosexuals

In 2008, the head of the World Health Organization’s HIV/AIDS division at the time, Dr. Kevin de Cook, made waves when he said “There will be no generalized epidemic of AIDS in the heterosexual population outside Africa.” He admitted that heterosexual epidemics were unlikely to erupt in countries outside of sub-Saharan Africa.

His comment came at a time when AIDS organizations like UN AIDS, the Global Fund, and the WHO were under fire for inflating their estimates of the number of infected people and diverting funds from other pressing health problems like malaria in addition to focusing on unrealistic measures like abstinence instead of condoms.

While transmission is indeed very low among heterosexuals and among gay men who are taking daily anti-viral medication and have undetectable viral loads, the scientists were quick to add that sex without a condom is still not a good idea because of the possibility of transmitting other sexually transmitted diseases. No one is suggesting that people should not practice safe sex, but it is important for the public to have a realistic idea about the odds.

Chemotherapie veroorzaakt kanker, stelt een wetenschappelijke studie vast

Chemotherapy causes cancer, science study finds, confirming Big Pharma’s “repeat business” model for cancer patients

Image: Chemotherapy causes cancer, science study finds, confirming Big Pharma’s “repeat business” model for cancer patients

(Natural News) Imagine if there was a natural remedy everybody was using to treat cancer, but then the FDA and CDC found out it actually caused more cancers to develop in the body, and scientific studies proved it. How fast would the FDA and CDC come in, shut it all down and make the treatment illegal? The news would be plastered all over mass media and everyone would know. There would be lawsuits for millions, if not billions of dollars, levied against the creators of the treatment. We would never hear the end of it. Consider, on top of that horror story, if thousands of doctors actually knew that the treatment method was a fraud, but kept using it on their cancer patients anyway because of the major revenue. How many of those doctors would lose their license to practice medicine and how many would serve time in federal prison for malpractice?

Thanks to scientific research at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, we now know that chemo SPREADS cancer

A new study that was just published in the journal Science Translational Medicine reveals chemotherapy increases the number of cancer cells circulating in the body and in the lungs. The chemotherapy drugs not only created new cancers, but spread them to other parts of the body where they are nearly always lethal. Dr George Karagiannis, of the Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University, New York, discovered the horrifying fact that chemotherapy caused new cancers for 20 patients receiving two very common chemotherapy drugs. Dr. Karagiannis noted that women could be monitored during chemo to observe when the cancer starts circulating and “doorways” begin emerging. This would be accomplished by obtaining a small amount of tumor tissue after a few doses of the preoperative chemo.

Patients with breast cancer who are given chemotherapy drugs prior to surgery shrink their breast tumors in the short run while triggering the spread of deadly cancer around the body. It’s like sealing up a wound only to find out later you’re bleeding to death internally. What good is that?

Why do the chemotherapy drugs cause new cancers? The doctors and scientists believe the toxic medication literally switches on a mechanism in the body that ultimately allows cancer tumors to come back with a vengeance and kill the patient. Top that off with the discovery that chemotherapy increases the number of “doorways” on blood vessels that allow the cancer to catapult to vital organs and tissues in the body.

If you study the history of chemotherapy, you will find out that Nazi scientists invented it, and they learned back in the 1950s (when they went to work for Big Pharma in America) that chemotherapy only temporarily rescinded cancer tumors, but brought back the cancer even worse. This new scientific research only reaffirms what only a few elitist insiders already knew.

Chemotherapy induces breast cancer metastasis through what is termed a TMEM-mediated mechanism (tumor microenvironment of metastasis). Plus, breast cancer is one of the most common tumor types, so this type of metastasis greatly increases the risk of death from this cell disorder that is exacerbated and spread by more chemicals.

How many people does the cancer industry KILL every year? Meet two of the most evil doctors on the planet: Farid Fata and David Gorski

What would happen to the cancer industrial complex and the fake “War on Cancer” if every single American stopped falling for the tricky sales tactics of the for-profit cancer industry and found out that chemotherapy creates more cancer? After all, what proof is there that surgery, chemotherapy and radiation are the best chance cancer victims have of surviving? The answer is none. How many Americans are aware that chemotherapy, on average, fails more than 97% of the time?

As of this moment in time, chemotherapy is exposed as a “repeat business model” for pharma. Just like many convicts in prison, chemotherapy is a “repeat offender,” as are the doctors who know this and still administer it on their patients. That brings us to discussing two evil doctors who do know, one of whom is serving 45 years in federal prison for giving chemo to his patients who didn’t even have cancer. In July of 2015, Detroit area oncologist Farid Fata, M.D. was investigated by the FBI and sentenced to prison for defrauding Medicare and private insurance companies, embezzling $17 million, and dosing his patients to death with lethal doses of chemo he called “The European Protocol.” He plead guilty in court, in case you were wondering. He also named several accomplices while on trial, but those names have been sealed and protected by the cancer industrial complex. They had to “burn a scarecrow” to make America believe that these types of crimes don’t go unpunished. So who else did Farid “the Fraudster” Fata name in court as “co-conspirators?”

Another Detroit area oncologist and a breast cancer surgeon was also reported to the FBIfor fraud and deception, but was never indicted. Who is that freak who knew Farid Fata and worked close to him at the same cancer industrial complex under the umbrella of Karmanos? That internet troll and atrocity to the cancer industry is Karmanos Cancer Center breast cancer surgeon David H. Gorski, who trolls the internet under his alias “ORAC.” Message boards on his virulently pro-vax and pro-chemotherapy website, “Respectful Insolence,” advocate fraudulently impersonating disease-injured families in the comment sections of medical freedom websites such as Age of Autism and Mothering Magazine. Gorski’s sole intent is to discredit anything that casts doubt on his money-making, cancer causing and pseudo-scientific religion.

The truth about chemotherapy is out and it’s not some conspiracy theory either. It’s been proven by science that chemotherapy creates new deadly cancers in the body. Are you convinced yet to contact your Naturopathic physician instead and learn about natural remedies that really do work, and don’t have horrific side effects?

Professor Anthony Hall’s academische vrijheidsstrijd komt voor de rechtbank

Professor Anthony Hall’s academic freedom struggle goes to court

Justice Minister intervenes against the witch hunt

University of Lethbridge Professor Anthony Hall recently had his day in court  – one of them, anyway – in his fight for academic freedom. Below is his report. We will discuss this, and much more, on False Flag Weekly News tomorrow (Friday) 11 to noon Eastern.  –Kevin Barrett, Veterans Today Editor

The Folly of University Governance Through Facebook Machinations


By Anthony Hall


Professor of Liberal Education and Globalization Studies

University of Lethbridge

On August 26, 2017, B’nai Brith Canada reported on its web site that a horrific Facebook post was affixed to my Facebook wall. The creator of the post, said to be Ben Garrison, was made to proclaim the intention to “Kill All Jews.” The text contained a very provocative image and other odious anti-Jewish phrases too disgusting to be reproduced here.

As I would learn in mid-September of 2016, B’nai Brith Canada began on August 26 a ruthless smear campaign against me. At the roots of this campaign was a maliciously engineered Facebook post. This post I did not create. Nor was I even aware of it until I first ran into a screen shot of the offending item on a web site called Israellycool.


What first caught my attention about the Israellycool report was a screen shot of a letter from the President of my University, Dr. Mike Mahon. Unlike the miniature text on the Facebook post, that would have such a profound impact on my life, the wording of Dr. Mahon’s letter was at least legible. It explained to a correspondent referred to simply as “J.P.” that “academic freedom….. should not be a shield for those who engage in illegal hate speech, or promote discrimination and violence.”

I am able now to understand better the background of Dr. Mahon’s letter. Its inspiration comes from a set of documents circulated on Aug. 27, one day after the planting of the maliciously engineered Facebook post. These documents were made to enter the offices of Alberta Premier Rachel Notley, Alberta Minister of Justice and Solicitor-General Kathleen Ganley, and the office of the U of L President.  The damning documents came my way recently as a result of a Freedom of Information request directed at the Alberta Ministry of Justice. This FOIP request began with an initiative by the Canadian Association of University Teachers, the umbrella organization of professional faculty associations representing 68,000 professors in our country.

CAUT became involved in this matter because Dr. Mahon suspended this tenured full professor based initially on a specious assertion by B’nai Brith Canada that I wrote the maliciously-engineered Facebook post. As time passed the story changed to become that the post’s reprehensible contents somehow embodied my views.

In the early hours of the B’nai Brith/Facebook Facebook campaign the post was described to the Notley/Ganley/Mahon triumvirate as if the words on the offending digital item were my own. The most provocative letter forwarded to the triumvirate indicated “academic freedom…was never intended as a shield for spewing hatred and threats against minorities, without accountability.” This turn of phrase invoking academic freedom as a “shield” for hate speech seems close to that of Dr. Mahon in his letter to J.P. published by “Aussie Dave” in Israellycool.

I was particularly dismayed to see the writer of this intervention pose the question to Dr. Mahon, copied to Alberta’s top law enforcement agents, “I encourage you to seriously consider whether you want someone on your faculty who would advocate the murder of Jews.”

Advocate the murder of Jews!  Now that is a stunning accusation whose extremity strikes me as more a matter for the criminal law than for the civil law. And the criminality lies on the part of the zealot or zealots that have slanderously attributed such a grotesque opinion to me. Who is responsible?

The staff of B’nai Brith Canada was very busy on August 26.  Moments after the post appeared, B’nai Brith officials say they contacted Facebook officials to ask them to take the item down. Then they say they widened their campaign. They raised the alarm in a press release with the headline, “Kill All Jews Is Now an Acceptable Message, Facebook Says.” Underneath this headline B’nai Brith reported, “The image, which was posted as a comment on the Facebook wall of University of Lethbridge Professor Anthony Hall, depicts a white man assaulting an Orthodox Jew, accompanied by a lengthy, violent antisemitic screed beside the photograph. It should be noted that Hall is well-known for using his academic credentials to deny the Holocaust and promote 9/11 conspiracy theories.”


When I initially saw this post in mid-September it was the first time I had ever seen myself referred to as a “holocaust denier” let alone a “well-known” holocaust denier. Based on what evidence is this assertion made? Let me add that I am indeed genuinely sceptical of the official narrative outlined in the report of the 9/11 Commission in the United States. I am far from alone in this position.

As for the repugnant image and the heavily racialized B’nai Brith description of it, the Zionist organization fails to acknowledge that the item has been photoshopped to insert the head of cartoonist Ben Garrison in the place of the Israeli security guard who appeared in the original photograph. This Israeli security guard was captured on film strongarming one of the rabbis involved in a demonstration protesting the running of an Israeli highway through a burial ground.

When I contacted Ben Garrison about the image and offending text, he said their real creator is Joshua Goldberg. From my research I have learned that the now-notorious Mr. Goldberg is presently in FBI custody for allegedly feeding bomb-making information to supposed jihadists while pretending on the Internet to be an Islamic terrorist himself.


On behalf of B’nai Brith Canada, Ryan Bellerose persuaded police in Lethbridge and Calgary to investigate me for hate speech and incitement to genocide. Rather than recognize that I had been framed by the authors of a Facebook scam, that I was the victim of an atrocious fraud, I was put in the category of protagonist.

After bringing in the police Mr. Bellerose became point person in B’nai Brith’s Alberta-wide media campaign including on the morning radio show of CBC Calgary. On the airwaves of the public broadcaster Mr. Bellerose introduced the story of the Facebook post on my wall by indicating,  “He used words like kike. He said he wanted to see them all killed.” Any reasonable listener would infer that the “he” Mr. Bellerose was referring to would be me. Why did CBC even treat this matter as a story given that that they played the audio tape where I first publicly condemned the reprehensible Facebook post. Is CBC been reduced to the level of a PR outlet for B’nai Brith Canada


Belangrijke aanvullende informatie is nu toegevoegd aan het eerder geplaatste artikel over de immuuntherapie voor kanker

Aangeleverd door: Corry

Belangrijke aanvullende informatie is nu toegevoegd aan het eerder geplaatste artikel over de

immuuntherapie voor kanker 

“E.e.a. staat schuin gedrukt”!


Wim Huppes (niet praktiserend internist) is een bijzondere man, een pionier die vooraan loopt in de file.
Hierdoor heeft hij een bijzondere ontwikkeling doorgemaakt, waarover hij verteld in een gesprek met Désirée Röver.

Hij is rond zijn 30e Internist met aantekening Oncologie èn Filosoof. Daarna begint hij opnieuw en studeert af als Moleculair Bioloog / Bio Technologie. Hierdoor veranderde zijn kijk op de dingen, zoals ook op o.a. kanker en ontwikkelde deze niet-toxische immunotherapie om kanker te genezen, die betaalbaar is en gewoon thuis kan worden toegepast.


In deze Nederlands-talige video (die van origine een radio-opname is en nu voorzien van beeldmateriaal) spreekt Wim Huppes met Désirée Röver over zijn leven en zijn weg naar deze therapie om kanker te genezen in haar radioshow Kaleidoscoop. https://youtu.be/yEZZ-8WqlKg

Immuuntherapie voor Kanker – Dr.Wim Huppes


Wim Huppes (niet praktiserend internist) is een bijzondere man, een pionier die vooraan loopt in de file. Hierdoor heeft hij een bijzondere ontwikkeling door…



Er is ook een Internationale variant van dit gesprek in het Engels. Dit is de link naar dit interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8rJwJ8rN7hI

Minority Of One Report – Desiree Rover talks to dr Wim Huppes




Het gaat om Epoluthon – Immuuntherapie voor Kanker.


De wetenschap achter Epoluthon is ouder dan 60 jaar. In de 19e eeuw werd het elektromagnetisme van licht al begrepen.

Tweehonderd jaar later ontkent de medische elite nog steeds dat elektromagnetisme fundamenteel is voor de geneeskunde. De biologie van elektromagnetisme ligt buiten hun gedachtegang, want ze zijn gefocust op de inkomsten uit chemotherapie.
Elektromagnetisme kan bij kanker worden ingezet met een truc. De kankercellen worden voorzien van een aluminium-jas. Nu zul je misschien denken ‘Aluminium, dat is toch hartstikke giftig! Dat kennen we toch als het ellende veroorzakende element bij vaccins?’ Dat heb je goed gedacht! Nu is het aluminium goed ingepakt in een molecuul, waarmee het zich hecht aan de buitenkant van de kanker. De kracht van aluminium is, dat de natuur en dus ook kanker er geen antwoord op heeft. Dit betekent, dat het aluminium gewoon weer gecheleert ofwel uitgeplast wordt.


De fotonen uit de aluminium-jas geven een elektromagnetische puls aan de haren van de immuuncellen, die hun elektrische lading verandert waardoor ze buigen, wat de immuuncel in actie schopt. De enorme kracht waarmee aluminium dit doet is nodig. Met andere elementen is de impuls te zwak. Alle andere immunotherapieën zijn te zwak gebleken.


Het licht van de lamp versterkt de immuunrespons in de femtometer (duizendmiljoen-miljoenste meter) grote wereld van de immuun-biologie.

De lamp levert intense nanoseconde flitsen van hoog energetische fotonen in de optimale golflengte om door het lichaam te reizen en bij de kanker te komen. De flits eindigt in de aluminiumjas van de kanker, die op zijn beurt een tweede golf van fotonen uitzendt (luminescentie), welke zich gedraagt als een elektromagnetische golf, die de elektrische lading van de haren op de immuun-cellen draait en daarmee de immuuncellen activeert.

De immuuntherapie op basis van aluminium bevordert zelf heling.


Patiënten gaan zich meteen beter voelen omdat de immunotherapie de kanker onder controle brengt.


Tijdens de therapie krijgt de kanker koorts en schakelt met grote snelheid het immuunsysteem in. Als het immuunsysteem maximaal werkzaam is, verdubbelt allereerst de grootte van de kanker door oedeem, zoals kan worden gemeten door een scan of lichamelijk onderzoek.

Het verdubbelt ook eerst de gemeten tumormarkers (bijvoorbeeld PSA). Daarna dalen de waarden. Meten van resultaten is een routine.

Artsen begrijpen dat ze deze resultaatmetingen moeten doen, die geruststellen en de remedie bewijzen.


Je verwacht dat de geavanceerde biotechnologie van Epoluthon duur is en alleen beschikbaar in een universiteitsziekenhuis.

Het is echter betaalbaar en kan gewoon thuis worden gebruikt.


De meeste patiënten verkiezen een thuisbehandeling.

Het zelf helende protocol houdt hen veilig met oplossingen bij problemen.


Het ontwikkelde, geteste en gedefinieerde protocol heeft mijlpalen en eenvoudige maatregelen die snelle feedback geven om de voortgang te volgen. Het helpt patiënten om de gewenste snelheid te bepalen en zich aan te passen aan de pijn en de temperatuur/koortsrespons van de kanker die kan worden gemeten met een smartphone.


Epoluthon wordt geleverd met een instructiekaart die aan de koelkastdeur kan worden bevestigd. De meeste primaire kankers en metastasen zijn minder dan 10 cm wanneer ze volgens de dokter ongeneeslijk zijn.

Behandeling in dit stadium is veilig en binnen de controle van de patiënt.

Bij 10 cm veroorzaakt de plaats van de kanker nauwelijks ernstige problemen. Het is bijvoorbeeld zeer zeldzaam dat een kanker van deze grootte zich in een grote slagader heeft geboord.


De problemen die verband houden met grotere kankers zijn oplosbaar. Het protocol behandelt de zware last van grotere kankers op het immuunsysteem.


Het belangrijkste punt is dat de snelheidsmeter op een middenstand moet worden ingesteld. Een kanker die op een moeilijke plek zit, zoals hersenen, long of lever, vereist speciale maatregelen die op grond van een scan worden bepaald.


Patiënten kunnen direct met de experts van het kernontwikkelingsteam spreken om begeleiding te krijgen.

Zij vormen een zelfhulpgemeenschap die graag hun ervaringen met nieuwe patiënten deelt.


Epoluthon wordt geleverd met een pakket ondersteuningsdiensten.


De website van Wim Huppes:



Bekijk ook deze korte video: