Dagelijkse archieven: 16 september 2017

Google’s Has a “Diversity” Virus

September 16, 2017

left,  (((Google’s))) way of saying, “This is the Future”? 
This is what you will get when you search “white mother with baby” on Google. 
Google is trying to impose its Luciferian agenda on its users. This is a serious problem since they control access to much discourse and information. This problem will likely get worse because their sponsors can’t allow people to learn the truth. We will need to demand that Google is regulated and migrate to another search engine in the meantime. 
Below, Michael Hoffman put James Damore’s courageous memo in perspective. 
“We shall erase from the memory of men all facts of previous centuries which are undesirable to us…”  Protocols of Zion 16
Firing people for their political views is the hallmark of Communism – Makow 
James Damore: The Diversity Religion’s Rebel
From Revisionist History 92: August-Sept 2017 
by Michael Hoffman
The morally presumptuous reformers of liberal culture’s civic religion–Diversity and Multiculturalism–are eager to limit free speech and impose thought control. This is a movement that gained traction with the campus “Free Speech Movement” of the 1960s, based at Berkeley, but it was mainly a ruse, a case of “Free speech for me and not for thee.” 
Now that the children of the hippies are in the driver’s seat at the head of the digital industries emanating outward like spokes on a wheel from the San Francisco Bay Area, the ’60s imperative for freedom of expression has taken a distant second to the moral obligation to suppress “hate speech,” a coda for any speech that challenges the orthodoxy of the Church of Diversity and Multiculturalism.
 One such challenger is James Damore, who has been fired by Google, a unit of Alphabet Inc., for “perpetuating gender stereotypes.” [Gender stereotypes only apply when they are reversed. -Makow] Damore is the author of a “contentious memo…that has enraged advocates of greater diversity in the technology industry. The memo has also served as a rallying cry for conservatives and the alt-right who view Google — and Silicon Valley — as a bastion of groupthink where people with different opinions are shamed into silence.


His 10-page memo, titled ‘Google’s Ideological Echo Chamber,’ argued that ‘personality differences’ between men and women — like a woman having a lower tolerance for stress — help explain why there were fewer women in engineering and leadership roles at the company. He said efforts by the company to reach equal representation of women in technology and leadership were ‘unfair, divisive, and bad for business.’ The memo was originally posted on an internal mailing list and was shared widely inside the company and throughout Silicon Valley. It struck a nerve and was harshly criticized.
After his firing, Mr. Damore, who was a senior software engineer in Google’s search division, said he had not expected this type of reaction. ‘As far as I know, I have a legal right to express my concerns about the terms and conditions of my working environment and to bring up potentially illegal behavior, which is what my document does,’ he said. Mr. Damore said he would probably take legal action against the company.
Like many new hires at Google, Mr. Damore boasted an impressive academic background. A competitive player of chess and computer strategy video games, he studied molecular and cellular biology at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, according to an online résumé. He conducted research in computational biology at Harvard, Princeton and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology before joining a Ph.D. program at Harvard.
“In a footnote for his memo, Mr. Damore said he considered himself a ‘classical liberal,’ an ideology associated with advocacy of…libertarianism….Few Google employees came out publicly in defense of him, but some surreptitiously showed their support by leaking screenshots from internal Google posts of employees saying they planned to create blacklists of people who did not support the company’s diversity efforts…Despite what the public response seems to have been, I’ve gotten many personal messages from fellow Googlers expressing their gratitude for bringing up those very important issues which they agree with but would never have the courage to say or defend because of our shaming culture and the possibility of getting fired,’ Mr. Damore wrote in an addendum to his original memo. ‘This needs to change.” (NY Times, August 9, 2017, p. B1).
 “…because of our shaming culture and the possibility of getting fired.” This is the epitaph written on the gravestone of creativity and independence. In the unleashing of the totalitarian Left in the Sixties, we were sold on the idea that by letting it happen we were being faithful to Thoreau and the First Amendment.
Tyrants, however, once in power, don’t respect Constitutional rights, and Thoreau’s unrestrained individualism is for them an ornament on a shelf to which lip service is paid. The shaming consists in conferring upon the genuine heirs of Thoreau epithets such as “homophobic, sexist, racist, bigot, hater.” After you’re shamed, you lose your livelihood (Damore was quickly fired after his cri-de-coeur was publicized). This is “freedom” in America. The Cryptocracy need not formally abridge the Bill of Rights when their opponents can be made to lose their reputations and careers. These tactics constitute sufficient enforcement of the pieties of Diversity and Multiculturalism to stifle dissent and maintain the momentum of the revolution. 
 Which brings us to the dangerous fact that Google, as the Internet search engine of choice, is a monopoly arbiter of content. It can prioritize web pages that are in line with sacred Multiculturalism and Diversity, and subordinate those that are antithetical to it.


Damore’s writing raised another issue which the New York Times and most of the rest of the mainstream media have regarded as too hot to handle.  According to him, many of Google’s “programs, mentoring and classes are only for people with a certain gender or race.” In other words “pale males” are discriminated against by Google. But wait–isn’t discrimination against a race or a gender a morally reprehensible hate crime? Ah, but you are forgetting, dear reader, the lesson of George Orwell’s Animal Farm: some are more equal than others.
Reprinted by permission from the September 2017 issue of Revisionist History®, a periodical published six times a year. Copyright©2017.
Makow comment- I am googling “Jewish demands for German extermination” – just one pertinent article. Google is definitely restricting our access to knowledge.

Waar komt de uitdrukking “Als een dief in de nacht” vandaan?

Aangeleverd door: Spruitje

The “Thief In The Night”.

May 11, 2017

The Thief in the Night

2 Peter 3:10 – “But that Day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night . . .”
1 Thessalonians 5:1 – “For you know very well that the Day of the Lord will come like a thief in the night.

Historical Pattern
The phrase, thief in the night, is yet another Hebrew idiom! This idiom refers to a practice mentioned in Leviticus 6:8-13 which states that the priest in charge must wear linen clothing and must keep the fires of the altar burning: “The burnt offering is to remain on the altar hearth throughout the night, till morning, and the fire must be kept burning on the altar. The priest shall then put on his linen clothes, with linen undergarments next to his body, . . . The fire must be kept burning on the altar continuously; it must not go out.”

The priests assigned to constantly watch over the altar fire and over the Menorah were never to fall asleep during their night of service. In order to insure that the priest(s) stayed awake, the High Priest would walk around the Temple looking for the priest(s). If a priest was found sleeping during a surprise visit, the High Priest would take hot coals from the altar fire, place some of the hot coals in a fire pan and take them over to the sleeping priest. He would then gently place the pan and hot coals under the sleeping priest’s clothing.

The priest’s linen clothing would soon be ignited in flames – clothing in those days did not have flame retardant chemicals imbedded into the cloth as do modern clothes. The guilty priest would have no choice but to leave his burning clothes and run burnt, naked, and ashamed back home. Quite a lesson not to fall asleep on the job or to be un-alert! It was this practice of surprise visits that according to Jewish tradition got the High Priest nicknamed “The Thief In The Night”!

Modern and Future Patterns
As individuals and as a church body, today’s people are not to fall asleep:
In Matthew 24:42-44, Yeshau says: “Keep awake therefore, for you do not know on what day your Lord is coming. But understand this: if the owner of the house had known in what part of the night the thief was coming, he would have stayed awake and would not have let his house be broken into.  Therefore you also must be ready, for the Son of Man is coming at an unexpected hour.”

The word translated keep awake is an active verb meaning: to keep watching, to be keeping alert, to stay on the alert, and to stay awake. It expects active and concentrated behavior, to be continuously seeking. This is repeated in the phrase “Therefore . . . must be ready” which means: to be especially prepared, ready. Twice in one paragraph Yeshua commands us to be on the alert and ready, to know when the time is near, for he – our High Priest – may come upon us unexpectedly, exactly has did the High Priest in earlier times.

Mark 13:33-36 puts it this way: “Take heed, keep on the alert; for you do not know when the appointed time will come. . .  Therefore, be on the alert – for you do not know when the master of the house is coming . . . What I say to you I say to all, ‘Be on the alert!” Three times in one paragraph Yeshua commands us to be on the alert and ready, to know when the time is near.

1 Thessalonians 5:1-11 –“ But you are not in darkness so that this day should surprise you like a thief.”
Paul clearly says that the Christians who live like children of the day and of the light will not be surprised by this surprise visit. The living Church will know when Yeshua will come, even if she knows neither the day nor the hour! Only those who are the members of the dead Church will be surprised. Yeshua confirms this in his letter to the sleeping Church in Sardis: “I will come upon you as a thief, and you will not know what hour I will come upon you.” (Revelation 3:3). We are to pray that we will escape the consequences of falling asleep and be worthy to stand before Yeshua (Luke 21:36).

The Tribulation Thief
Revelation 16:15 – “Behold, I am coming as a thief. Blessed are all who are watching for me and who keep their robes, not having to go about naked and exposed to shame.”
Falling asleep is equivalent to wearing linen clothing and having hot coals placed upon those clothes. And this is what Yeshua means to emphasize in the time of Great Tribulation when he warns that he will come like the “Thief In The Night”, burning up any clothing and causing sleeping individuals to walk naked and ashamed.

Revelation 3:3 – “Remember then what you received and heard; obey it, and repent. If you do not wake up, I will come like a thief, and you will not know at what hour I will come to you.”. . . ”
The phrase “Thief In The Night” was a known Hebrew idiom during the first coming of Yeshua – it was a title applied to the High Priest. The consequence of falling asleep on the job always applied to the slothful, sleeping, and unprepared individual, not to an individual who was watching, waiting, obedient and prepared. The consequences for being asleep were, still are, and will be – severe. That asleep individual is left burnt, naked, and ashamed. The alert individual, however, is found worthy to stand before Yeshua, clothed in righteousness.